Lol, I will do that
I hope my live trials with this are as good as my demo
Warm Regards
Shiva
http://www.nyfx.org http://www.dubaitradeguide.com http://www.tradeguide.cn
--- On Fri, 6/27/08, Forex Optimist <forex.optimist (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
From: Forex Optimist <forex.optimist (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] Mod EA of WIllama system
To: MetaTrader_Experts_and_Indicators (A...oups (DOT) com
Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:38 AM
Hi Shiva ;-)
Pretty cool statement you have there. I read right throught the FPA
thread (the blue typeface is hard on the eyes!) and just when I
thought I had grasped the concept, i.e. doubling lots in the opposite
direction, out popped that EA with no lot doubling. But apparently
it's normal, for reasons that I will doubtless grasp later lol. Anyway
it seems to work. But we must be careful of over-trading.
Happy live trading with it, keep us posted!
^ Optimist ^
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Shivanand <shivanund (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
> Hope this comes out corrent!!
>
>
>
> Frankly Sam, I agree with you This does look like the answer. According
to
> willama, the author of this EA made a few errors in implementing the
> strategy - Perhaps that was a good error! This robot seems to work
> amazingly well.
>
> My last statment posted here must have showed an equity of 3 799.29 - But
> now when I write this it is 3 946.05 ! All trades closed with a few
pending
> orders.
>
> I intend to let this EA run my live account from Monday using micro lots
at
> 1 cent per pip (Tempted to do it with a full lot though lol )
>
> Warm Regards
>
> Shiva
> http://www.nyfx.org
> http://www.dubaitradeguide.com
> http://www.tradeguide.cn
>
> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Shivanand <shivanund (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
>
> From: Shivanand <shivanund (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] Mod EA of WIllama system
> To: MetaTrader_Experts_and_Indicators (A...oups (DOT) com
> Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 10:58 AM
>
> Something went wrong with my last post lol
>
>
>
> Frankly Sam, I agree with you This does look like the answer. According
to
> willama, the author of this EA made a few errors in implementing the
> strategy - Perhaps that was a good error! This robot seems to work
> amazingly well.
>
>
>
> My last statment posted here must have showed an equity of
>
> 3 799.29- But now when I write this it is 3 946.05 ! All trades closed
with
> a few pending orders.
>
>
>
> I intend to let this EA run my live account from Monday using micro
> lots at 1 cent per pip (Tempted to do it with a full lot though lol )
>
>
>
>
> Warm Regards
>
> Shiva
> http://www.nyfx. org
> http://www.dubaitradeguide .com
> http://www.tradeguide. cn
>
> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Shivanand <shivanund (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
>
> From: Shivanand <shivanund (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] Mod EA of WIllama system
> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 10:51 AM
>
> Frankly Sam, I agree with you This does look like the answer. According
to
> willama, the author of this EA made a few errors in implementing the
> strategy - Perhaps that was a good error! This robot seems to work
> amazingly well.
>
>
>
> My last statment posted here must have showed an equity of
>
> 3 799.29- But now when I write this it is 3 946.05 ! All trades closed
with
> a few pending orders.
>
>
>
> I intend to let this EA run my live account from Monday using micro
> lots at 1 cent per pip (Tempted to do it with a full lot though lol )
>
>
>
> Warm Regards
>
> Shiva
> http://www.nyfx. org
> http://www.dubaitradeguide .com
> http://www.tradeguide. cn
>
> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Sam <cci2fx (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
>
> From: Sam <cci2fx (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] Mod EA of WIllama system
> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 9:19 AM
>
> Shivanand,
>
> Thanks for the head up on Willama system. The result is nice and may be
> this is the answer to our search.
>
> Sam
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Shivanand
> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:28 AM
> Subject: [MT_E and I] Mod EA of WIllama system
>
> Hi guys, here is the final statment of this EA which was supposed to be
run
> as per willama's system ( http://www.forexpea cearmy.com/ forex-forum/
> forex-trading- systems-strategi es/2397-williama s-trading- system.html )
>
>
>
> Its on ALpari Demo at 1:100 leverage with opening balance of 3000.00
>
>
>
> EA Attached
>
> Warm Regards
>
> Shiva
> http://www.nyfx. org
> http://www.dubaitradeguide .com
> http://www.tradeguide. cn
>
> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Eben Brand <eben.brand (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
>
> From: Eben Brand <eben.brand (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
> Subject: RE: [MT_E and I] Winning EAs= Math based EAs that don't use
> indicators
> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 6:16 AM
>
> As always, very sensible, Charles!!
>
>
>
> While having said that, there is one thing that does repeat itself, and
> that's chart patterns, in the bigger scheme of things, esp on the 4H
and D1
> TFs, so maybe I can rally some support from likeminded individuals to
build
> an EA that matches chart patterns to a known set of patterns, and then
> trades on 'the last leg' of the pattern, which is essentially what
the BIG
> divergence / gartley traders do. To time entry one could then look at e.g..
> bollinger and divergence between MACD and price movement, which indicates
> something is to happen soon.
>
>
>
> Just musing away here, also a bit disillusioned with the average EA, even
> with the 'good' EA… At the same time I do believe it is possible
to develop
> EAs that are profitable, and that somehow use price action to determine
its
> course of action.
>
>
>
> I also believe that there are ways to capture market movements with a
> grid-based system, some brokers will just complain over the large number
of
> orders being placed – not sure why, as it means more profit for them.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Eben
>
>
>
>
>
> From: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
> [mailto:MetaTrader_ Experts_and_ Indicators@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf
Of
> Charles Wilkes
> Sent: 27 June 2008 12:16 PM
> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] Winning EAs= Math based EAs that don't use
> indicators
>
>
>
> Wow! This is certainly radical, yet many have told me exactly the same
> thing (indicators don't work), and the logic re EAs not working is
certainly
> correct in my experience. I've got maybe a thousand -- well, at
least
> several hundred EAs, none of which work consistently. And if they did,
the
> author would be using them, not selling them or giving them away (we are
all
> soft hearted here). So the comments here are spot on.
>
>
>
> What to do about it. I've pretty much given up on EAs, but I do try
to use
> the power of the computer to help me trade manually. I have also given
up
> long ago on the idea of artificial intelligence -- doesn't work
either, and
> that is what EAs try to implement I think. But the author of this
original
> note came up with something I hadn't considered -- that they could be
a way
> to use the power of the computer in new ways to "win" that is
beyond the
> power of the brain at least as we know it. If this is true, then pure
math
> is the only hope to figure that out for sure. But yet many indicators
were
> written or originally proposed by some of the best math wizards the world
> has yet produced. Doesn't mean they were the best that will ever
exist --
> that is an evolving field as well as everything else that humanity has
ever
> done.
>
>
>
> So the proposed idea of profit catching is one idea which certainly should
> be developed. And time will work it's evolutionary magic and find
many
> other ways as it always has. But for this to happen, there must be
> collaboration between idea developers. It will never happen in the dark
by
> a single individual, no matter what his genius level may be. So at least
> in my opinion it's certainly okay to make a fresh start -- abandon
> indicators (many have done this already), but don't abandon working
together
> with others of like minds. Please don't give up on forums -- they
are the
> only hope to find collaborators with common interests. I'm not
proposing
> myself -- I'm content to be an interested spectator. But there are
many who
> should be working together on this problem. Hopefully I'll see the
results
> of this before I'm out of the picture.
>
>
>
> Charles Wilkes
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:27 AM, StevenEnsign <stevenensign@
yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
------------------------------------
For archives of Experts and Indicators from the MetaTrader Experts and
Indicators Group
See
http://www.forexmt4.com/ or
http://www.lightpatch.com/forex
Yahoo! Groups Links
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/