View Single Post
Old 07-16-2008, 06:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Shaun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [MT_E and I] EA's to list on a group Black List

hey all,

been reading these threads and i'm keen to help in a different way.

just an idea, i can help make a website where we can list all the EA's being
tested and their ongoing results.

lemme know your thoughts on this



On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Charles Wilkes <cfw123 (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

> Wow -- lots of you out there really agree on the necessity of a black
> list -- we've all been burned too many times.
>
> I really want the Black List to be implemented right to make it very easy
> to add to, and especially to consult before buying anything. I really
> don't have the knowledge to do this in other than a crude way. Is there
> any expert out there to insure that it is done right the first time? I've
> been a user and creator of many yahoogroups over the years, but I don't
> recall seeing anything similar to what we really need here done anywhere
> else -- else I would just copy it as I hate to invent anything new when
> there was already a satisfactory solution already in existence.
>
> One thing I see as important. Obviously producers of for-sale EAs and
> other Forex systems won't like this, and will try to stop it. And I don't
> want any of them to try and sue or even threaten to sue anybody for libel
> somehow. So I think contributions should be by people who bought the
> product, and feel burned by it, and want to give their professional opinion
> on it which is their constitutional right to do under our free speech laws.
> A contributor should not be the producer of a competitive product trying to
> bad mouth their competition either directly or through a fake shill
> either. I've seen that on Forex Bastards, aka Forex Peace Army these days.
>
> So let's do this right the first time, with the right set of guidelines for
> contributors to both protect them, and to make it worth while for the rest
> of us to use.
>
> And maybe to be perfectly fair and balanced, we need a matching White List
> to include items reported by users which were good, rather than bad. Maybe
> there won't be too many, but why not have it planned for.
>
> Charles Wilkes
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Red Baron <
> public_enemy_nummer_uno (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, All
>>
>> I say, MAKE SURE YOUR EA DO THE RIGHT THING...!!!
>> well scam is everywhere, even ANYWHERE.
>> and sometime we were just right "go ahead" jump on it.
>> even if they give it to you.
>> AGREE.. MAKE THE BLACK LIST
>> especially for commercial profit taker scam bag money back guarantee EA
>>
>> baron
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 7/15/08, Smoky <smokyatgroups (AT) gmail (DOT) com>* wrote:
>>
>> From: Smoky <smokyatgroups (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
>> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] EA's to list on a group Black List
>> To: MetaTrader_Experts_and_Indicators (A...oups (DOT) com
>> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 10:38 PM
>>
>>
>> Hi Charles,
>> Yes let me know if I can help with this, I shall.
>> GL & GT Gerry
>>
>> *-------Original Message----- --*
>>
>> *From:* Charles Wilkes <cfw123 (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
>> *Date:* 16/07/2008 9:15:28 AM
>> *To:* MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com<MetaTrader_Experts_and_Indicators (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [MT_E and I] EA's to list on a group Black List
>>
>> If enough other's agree, maybe we can get our moderator to set up a
>> Black List (fraudulent EAs) in our files section, to which we can all
>> contribute our "disappointments" with EAs we have bought and paid for.
>>
>> Charles Wilkes
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, T K <teknapp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com<teknapp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Charles:
>>
>> I think that is a great idea. It would help everyone in the group. There
>> is already so much to learn and process, we don't need to waste time sorting
>> out the fraud, too.
>>
>> TEK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> aTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com<aTrader_Experts_and_Indicators (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com>
>> From: cfw123 (AT) gmail (DOT) com <cfw123 (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:35:23 -0700
>>
>> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] EA's for review-DOUBLE PLAY.
>>
>>
>> This is another one I bought only to find it quickly loses all the
>> capital funds in your account (demo for me of course). I contacted their
>> support three times, but it was totally wasted to even bother.
>>
>> I think we need a black list of EA frauds perpetrated upon unsuspecting
>> people who fall for slick marketing (like unfortunately I did). It could be
>> in our files section.
>>
>> Charles Wilkes
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Jacob Ade <jacobade (AT) yahoo (DOT) com<jacobade (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>>
>> wrote:
>> Forex Auto pilot is a mish mash of EAs and they all lose money on
>> demo acct, dont be fooled by the slick marketing
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 15/7/08, Miguel Contreras <mpcontreras@ yahoo.com<mpcontreras (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
>> >* wrote:

>> From: Miguel Contreras <mpcontreras@ yahoo.com <mpcontreras (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>>
>> Subject: Re: [MT_E and I] EA's for review-DOUBLE PLAY.
>> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com<MetaTrader_Experts_and_Indicators (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com>
>> Date: Tuesday, 15 July, 2008, 8:12 PM
>>
>> Don't bother testing Doubleplay. I did it.
>> For sure you'll lose a lot of money.
>>
>>
>> --- On *Tue, 7/15/08, goldom <goldom (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>* wrote:
>>
>> From: goldom <goldom (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
>> Subject: [MT_E and I] EA's for review
>> To: MetaTrader_Experts_ and_Indicators@ yahoogroups. com
>> Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008, 8:36 AM
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> How about Phoenix EA? It's free. PipBoxer. Forex Killer. PointBreak.
>> Fractal Wizard. Shark.
>> Griffin. DoublePlay. Forex AutoPilot.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Not happy with your email address?
>> Get the one you really want <http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html> -
>> millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo!<http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
  Reply With Quote